PERFORMANCE FLAW CHARTS
 
 
This page will demonstrate to you how the performance flaw impacts all processors. But it does not compare them with one another. For comparisons go to the evaluation section of this site.
Processors in this page: Pentium (MMX), AMD K6, Cyrix 6x86MX, Pentium II, Cyrix 6x86, AMD K5, IDT C6, Pentium Pro, 486.
 

Chart guide:
The 'normal' rate is the rate which is achieved with the best normal way possible.
The 'innovative' rate is achieved by knowing the performance flaw and applying our workarounds.
The source of these charts is Membench. For more information click on any chart.
The performance flaw we are revealing in this site is affecting the read and transfer rates not the write rates. Please click on the underlined words in the following tables for more information.

I' Intel Pentium / Pentium MMX-200 MHz

Note: The plain non-MMX Pentium has almost identical results.
System configuration: Intel Pentium MMX-200 on Intel's TX chipset with 64 Mb EDO memory, Matrox Mystique 4 MB graphics card, Quantum Fireball 3.2 hard disk. All three socket 7 processors (Pentium MMX, AMD K6, Cyrix 6x86MX) have been tested on exactly the same computer.
 
 
As you can see from the chart, on Intel Pentium MMX processors the impact of the innovative method is the most dramatic of all other processors.
So, If all workarounds where applied, an Intel Pentium (MMX) would have:
 
% improvement with workarounds applied:
  Read  Write  Transfer 
memory  +68% +100%  +92%
L2 cache   +51% +100%  +69%
video    N/A   +17%  +19%
 
 
 
II' AMD K6-200 MHz

System configuration: AMD K6-200 MHz (66*3) on exactly the same system as the previous one.
 
 
As you can see from the chart, AMD K6 has the flaw to its full degree. Remarks: 

So, If all workarounds where applied, an AMD K6-200 would have only:
 
% improvement with workarounds applied:
  Read  Write  Transfer 
memory    +1%    -1%   +4%
L2 cache     +6%    -9%   -1%
video    N/A  +81% +55%
 


III' Cyrix 6x86MX (M2)-166 MHz (PR200)
 
Note: Usually Cyrix processors carry the designation IBM. IBM just manufactures them, Cyrix designs them; Cyrix is a fab-less chip vendor.

System configuration: Cyrix 6x86MX-166 MHz PR200 (66*2.5) on exactly the same system as the previous ones.
 
Remarks:

So, If all workarounds where applied, a Cyrix 6x86 PR200 would have:
 
% improvement with workarounds applied:
  Read  Write  Transfer 
memory    +69%    -1%  +13%
L2 cache       +9%   +9%    -1%
video    N/A  +13% +15%
 
 


IV' Intel  Pentium II-233 MHz
 
System configuration: Intel Pentium II-233 on Intel's FX chipset with 64 Mb EDO memory, Matrox Mystique 4 MB graphics card, Quantum Fireball 3.2 hard disk.
 
Remarks: 

So, If all workarounds where applied, a Pentium II-233 would have:
 
% improvement with workarounds applied:
  Read  Write  Transfer 
memory     +4%     +1%   +4%
L2 cache    +21%     +0%   +2%
video    N/A +100% +64%
 

V' Cyrix 6x86 (M1)-133 MHz (PR166)
 
Values are similar to Cyrix M2 but with no write allocation and no MMX. For detailed results look in Membench (Cyrix M1 is one of the 8 computers you can compare your computer to).
So, If all workarounds where applied, a Cyrix 6x86-133 MHz would have:
 
% improvement with workarounds applied:
  Read  Write  Transfer 
memory   +55%   +42% +13%
L2 cache      +5%   +29%  -11%
video      N/A     +9%   +7%
 

VI' AMD K5-100 MHz 

K5 is AMD's last generation processor. In contrast to M2 which is an improved version of M1, K5 and K6 have nothing in common; K6 was derived from Nextgen's 786. For detailed results look at submitted results.
So, If all workarounds where applied, an AMD K5-100 MHz would have:
 
% improvement with workarounds applied:
  Read  Write  Transfer 
memory   +29%  +35%   +3%
L2 cache    +23%  +97% +34%
video      N/A      0%     0%
 
The video improvements are 0% due to the slow video card (no name S3 Virge) which can't handle more than 16.7 Mb/sec (we have seen that in 3 different ones).

 
VII' IDT C6 

We haven't been able to find one; if IDT sends us one, we will provide detailed flaw analysis and a dedicated page at the evaluation section of our site.
 

VIII' Intel Pentium Pro-233

System configuration: Intel Pentium Pro-233 MHz (pushed)- 512k internal L2 cache, on a Gigabyte motherboard with Intel's FX chipset with 64 Mb 50 nSec EDO memory, Matrox Mystique 4 MB graphics card, Quantum Fireball 3.2 hard disk.

For remarks look at Pentium II (Pentium II is essentially a Pentium Pro MMX with half speed cache).
For detailed results look in Membench or at submitted results.
So, If all workarounds where applied, a Pentium II-233 would have:
 
% improvement with workarounds applied:
  Read  Write  Transfer 
memory     +4%     +1% +10%
L2 cache    +39%     +2%   +2%
video    N/A +100% +64%
 
 

IX' Intel/AMD 486SX/DX/DX2/DX4/DX5 

The same flaw exists also on 486 processors. But due to the different burst length (16 bytes instead of 32), Membench's innovative measurements are entirely incorrect.
 


Proceed to schematic demonstration of the read buffer flaw.

If you can handle it, proceed to in-depth technical analysis.

Results users submitted.
 
Return to main page.
 
Click one of these buttons to go to the evaluation section.
 
 

For questions, go to the Q&A page.
For comments or suggestions, mail us
 
 
 
Intel and Pentium are registered trademarks of Intel corporation.
Other trademarks referenced in this site are owned by their respective companies.

Everything at this web site is the property of Intelligent Firmware Ltd. You may not repost/publish this information without our explicit permission.